Photography > Aerial
Reconnaissance and Imagery Analysis > Photo
Interpretation & Imagery
Analysis > Photo
/ Imagery Interpretation Techniques
Imagery-Derived
Intelligence Information Reporting
Introduction
The battlefield commander needs information that
is current and accurate to make valid decisions
about when, where, how, and why forces and resources
are to be committed. Imagery-derived information
is of highest tactical value at the time of acquisition,
and depreciates rapidly from that moment. The
location of a convoy two hours ago may have some
value,
but knowing its exact location, now, gives the
commander many more option. Further, having a
real time sensor on a platform able to loitering
over
the area of the activity tracking and monitoring
the enemy’s actions, yields tremendous
flexibility.
In the tactical arena, on the battlefield, the
timeliness of target and intelligence information
is the critical factor. A minimum of detail is
required for the commander to make a decision.
Acquire and identify the enemy, their equipment,
and actions whenever and wherever possible. Detailed,
exhaustive analysis can be of value in after action,
assessments, contingency planning and thus has
its own place away from the battlefield environment.
At the strategic level, particularly at national
exploitation facilities, timeliness may not be
a consideration but because the reporting performed
here requires extensive research and analysis there
is more attention to finite detail than is possible
or required at the tactical level. In essence,
the mission is distinctly different, so that a
comparison between tactical and strategic imagery
exploitation is akin to mixing apples and oranges.
Both exploitation levels have a specific role and
are essential to the overall intelligence production
process.
Tactical Exploition
At the tactical level, imagery-derived intelligence
information is used to satisfy the commanders immediate
information needs, called essential elements of information,
or EEI, or other intelligence requirements (QIRs).
Generally, the image resource responds to requirements
for immediate identification of items of tactical
significance, assists in operational planning, and
provides a current, accurate display of an area of
interest to assists the commander in employment of
troops, weapons, and other resources at his disposal.
In developing this support, the IA uses imagery to
derive the following general types of information:
-
Location and types of enemy weapons, troop
concentrations,
-
Location of enemy installations including missiles,
artillery, stationary and mobile supply/POL and transshipment,
communications and LOCs,
-
Status/conditions of roads, bridges and other
infrastructure, and
-
Other Information Requirements from Commanders.
First-phase reporting is done via in-flight reports,
mission reports (MISREP) which served as the most immediate reporting,
and the immediate
interpretation report (HOTREP) which was provided within
an hour of completion of film process. Keep in mind, the completion
of a mission
only meant that the film was downloaded from the aircraft
and then had to go through processing. Most interpretation at the
tactical level
was done from negatives, not the more typical positive
view. With the advent of real time imaging sensors, these kinds of
reporting requirements
have been replaced by a more situation responsive decision
process, one that allows the commander’s designated representatives
to make decisions directly, often to engage or not engage the acquired
targets.
Strategic and Detailed Imagery Analysis
Strategic and what we called Third Phase reporting was hardly time sensitive,
sometimes never taking place, and entailed a variety of report forms,
including formal, published documents. This phase of reporting reflected
an extended, in-depth all-source analysis and was not intend to serve
the immediate needs of the battlefield commander. Typical of the third
phase reports was Basic Imagery Interpretation Report (BIIR) and the
Direct Support Imagery Interpretation Report (DSIIR). Both of these
reports were generally hard-copy and focused on a particular objective
or subject, e.g., a new missile system.
With the exception of the first-phase reporting, usually done
via some message form, collecting, organizing, assessing, and preparing
the formal reports was a demanding, time-consuming process. Obviously,
all the sources of information had to be systematically assembled and
go through an analytical process to produce a meaningful intelligence
report.
As a matter of routine, the analysis process began with an
overview scan of the imagery of the target area. Maps and charts were
used in conjunction with this scan to confirm the plot of the imagery
and review information contained on maps. Maps are essential as a point
of reference, and can give clues and information required in the report.
Existing all-source intelligence reporting files and documents are searched
to define all the information available about the target and compare
it with the imagery. All of these elements, combined with a detail analysis
of the imagery, yielded a formal report, complete with maps, diagrams,
measurements, and narrative discussion of various features of the subject.
|
|